'Goodness' Concepts in the Study of Organizations: A Longitudinal Survey of Four Leading Journals
调查了四本顶级组织期刊35年间349篇文章，发现“绩效”和“有效性”最常被研究，而“效率”和“生产力”很少涉及；仅五分之一文章提供了理论定义，且1975年后无名义定义的文章增多。
The study of organizational 'goodness' is examined in four leading organiza tional journals (American and European) spanning a period of 35 years. The survey of 349 articles shows that 'performance' and 'effectiveness' have been studied most frequently, while 'efficiency' and 'productivity' are rarely addressed. Since 1978, performance has become the single most dominant concept in the literature. Organization Studies was more likely to publish stud ies of effectiveness, whereas The Academy of Management Journal and The Administrative Science Quarterly were more likely to study performance. Only one fifth of the studies provide a theoretical definition of the concepts used, and the number of articles without a nominal definition has increased since 1975. The provision of definitions was more prominent in The Academy of Management Review and Organization Studies than in the other two journals. The results suggest that the literature does not offer a consistent approach to the study of organizational goodness and that measurement is largely erratic.