Are Scores on Hofstede's Dimensions of National Culture Stable over Time? A Cohort Analysis
通过世界价值观调查数据复制霍夫斯泰德的文化维度，发现当代社会在个人主义和放纵维度得分更高、权力距离更低，但国家间相对排名和文化距离总体稳定，对全球战略研究有启示。
H ofstede's framework, which is based on survey data collected in the late 1960s and early 1970s, dominates quantitative culture research in international strategic management. However, as countries develop economically, modernization theory predicts shifts in cultural values, which likely affect countries' scores on H ofstede's work‐related values dimensions, in turn raising doubt about the continued relevance of this framework for global strategy researchers and practitioners. We examine how country scores on H ofstede's dimensions have developed over time by replicating H ofstede's dimensions for two birth cohorts using data from the World Values Survey. Results indicate that, on average, contemporary societies score higher on Individualism and Indulgence versus Restraint, and they score lower on Power Distance than do past societies. We find that cultural change is absolute rather than relative, meaning that countries' scores on the H ofstede dimensions relative to the scores of other countries have not changed very much. As a consequence, cultural differences between country pairs (i.e., cultural distances) are generally stable. We discuss the implications of our findings for global strategy research.