The scholarly exchange of knowledge in Operations Management
研究了1998-2007年间运营管理期刊与其他管理学科（管理、营销、金融）之间的思想交流，发现运营管理期刊自引率高、学科内引用低，可能形成方法论孤岛，建议增加学术交流多样性。
Abstract A number of studies have investigated the quality of journals in Operations Management. This research steps back from these studies and investigates the exchange of ideas within Operations Management journals and between other management disciplines (Management, Marketing, and Finance) during the last decade (1998–2007). Journal citation metrics provide a measure for the exchange of scholarly ideas. Operations Management (OM) journals show a willingness to cross‐pollinate ideas with other management disciplines. But, they also tend to have a higher level of self citations and lower level of within discipline citation exchanges when compared to other management disciplines. As a result, Operations Management journals may reflect methodological silos in the field that could potentially dampen scholarly exchange. In general, increasing the diversity of scholarly exchanges within Operations Management, and conducting more cross‐disciplinary research with other management disciples should improve the scholarly development of Operations Management.