The Learning Style Inventory: Still Less than Meets the Eye
回应了对Kolb学习风格理论的批评，指出其量表信度低、依赖未发表研究、构念效度支持不足，按学术标准该量表会导致不可靠和无效的推断。
Kolb's reply to our critique of his learning style theory and Learning Style Inventory (LSI) inappropriately overgeneralizes our criticisms of the LSI to all experiential learning theories, excuses low reliability estimates as part of his theory, depends largely on unpublished studies to support his views, and claims strong construct validity support based on unpublished correlations that never exceed -.37. Judged by accepted academic standards, the LSI is an instrument that, if used on an individual learning basis, will result in excessive unreliable and invalid inferences on the part of the user.