全球专业服务公司:“一体化”模式与(意大利)遥远的制度化实践

The Global Professional Service Firm: ‘One Firm’ Models versus (Italian) Distant Institutionalized Practices

ORGANIZATION STUDIES · 2013
被引 107
人大 AFT50ABS 4

中文导读

通过研究英国大型律师事务所进入意大利的历史案例,分析当地法规、规范和文化框架如何制约全球专业服务公司的战略与实践,强调制度距离对实践复制的微观影响。

Abstract

Through a historical case study of the internationalization of large English law firms into Italy, this paper uses Scott’s (2005) three pillars approach to look at how local institutions constrain and mediate the strategies and practices of global professional services firms. In doing so, it corrects the economic bias in the growing body of literature on the internationalization of PSFs by stressing how local regulations, norms and cultural frameworks affect the reproduction of home country practices, such as the one firm model pursued by large English law firms, in host-country jurisdictions. The paper also extends existing work on institutional duality (Kostova, 1999, Kostova & Roth, 2002) by developing a fine-grained, micro-level analysis which emphasizes the connections between institutions and practices. This is crucial, we contend, since the difficulties encountered by PSFs (and multinationals more generally) in their internationalization do not result from collisions between home- and host-country institutional structures per se, but between the diverse practices generated by distant institutional environments.

国际商务制度理论专业服务公司经济地理