Hegemonic Academic Practices: Experiences of Publishing from the Periphery
基于一项英芬联合出版经历的反思，揭示了学术出版机构通过霸权实践维持英语核心国家与芬兰等边缘地区之间的中心-边缘关系，导致边缘学者在出版过程中自我他者化。
Drawing on a reflexive account of a British—Finnish joint publishing experience, we suggest that institutions of academic publishing are constantly reproduced through hegemonic practices that serve to maintain and reinforce core-periphery relations between the Anglophone core and peripheral countries such as Finland. The wider academic milieu with its taxonomies of academic performance and journal quality serves to perpetuate these practices. This results in academic researchers from the periphery contributing to `othering' within the publishing process.