Impact Targets versus Discharge Standards in Agricultural Pollution Management
研究发现，保护溪流鱼类时，使用栖息地适宜性目标比沉积物或侵蚀目标更有效，能通过增加作物多样性和减少免耕等措施以更低成本实现污染治理。
Abstract When attempting to protect fish in streams, sediment or erosion targets are inefficient. Use of a habitat suitability target reveals lower cost abatement measures because it accounts for pesticides as well as soil particles. In Lake Michigan case studies, the lower cost measures involve more crop diversity, less use of no‐till, and changes on more acres than the solutions based on sediment discharges or erosion rates.