Why All Researchers Should Report Effect Sizes and Their Confidence Intervals: Paving the Way for Meta–Analysis and Evidence–Based Management Practices
呼吁实证研究者在报告中提供标准化效应量及其置信区间，以支持元分析和循证管理实践，促进创业知识的系统积累。
The growing body of empirical entrepreneurship studies and the advent of meta–analytic methodologies create new opportunities to develop evidence–based management practices. To support research on evidence–based practices, empirical studies should report meta–analysis relevant information, such as standardized effect–size measures and their confidence intervals. The corresponding changes in reporting practices are simple and straight forward—yet they promise strong contributions to the systematic accumulation of entrepreneurship knowledge over time.