Capital Account Liberalization: What Do Cross-Country Studies Tell Us?
回顾了关于资本账户自由化的跨国实证研究，指出其效果存在争议且结论不一，不同理论视角对自由化的可取性有不同看法，实证分析也未得出一致结论。
Capital account liberalization, it is \n fair to say, remains one of the most controversial and least \n understood policies of our day. One reason is that different \n theoretical perspectives have very different implications \n for the desirability of liberalizing capital flows. Another \n is that empirical analysis has failed to yield conclusive \n results. The answer, another influential strand of thought \n contends, is that this efficient-markets paradigm is \n fundamentally misleading when applied to capital flows. \n Limits on capital movements are a distortion. It is an \n implication of the theory of the second best that removing \n one distortion need not be welfare enhancing when other \n distortions are present.