Objective Versus Advocacy Models of Scientific Enterprise: A Comment on the Mitroff Myth
作者在阅读Armstrong（1980）的文章时误入其圈套，由此论证科学报道必须保持客观公正，而倡导方法仅适用于研究过程。
In reading an article by Armstrong (1980) the present author misinterpreted the paper, falling victim to Armstrong's hoax. This incident dramatizes how readers are compelled to rely on objective reporting, and raises questions about an advocacy approach to science, an approach promoted by Mitroff and criticized by Armstrong. It is argued here that a distinction must be made: advocacy is useful in conducting research but impartiality is required in reporting research.