On Good Scholarship, Goal Setting, and Scholars Gone Wild
定义了优秀学术，指出与Locke和Latham（2009）的分歧，呼吁研究目标设定的全面影响，强调目标设定如强效药物，既有益也可能产生系统性负面结果，需谨慎使用和监控。
Executive Overview In this article, we define good scholarship, highlight our points of disagreement with Locke and Latham (2009), and call for further academic research to examine the full range of goal setting's effects. We reiterate our original claim that goal setting, like a potent medication, can produce both beneficial effects and systematic, negative outcomes (Ordóñez, Schweitzer, Galinsky,& Bazerman, 2009), and as a result, it should be carefully prescribed and closely monitored.