Communication and Voting in Multi‐party Elections: An Experimental Study
通过多党选举实验，研究了沟通限制对投票率、策略投票和选举结果的影响，发现选民间沟通降低投票率，而党内沟通促进策略投票，且限制沟通导致收入分配更不平等。
We investigate communication and costly voting in multi‐party election experiments. Turnout is consistently lower across electorate communication as compared with restricted communication within parties. Voters are more likely to choose the strategic voting option at the outset in restricted communication but more likely to start deliberation by stating their first preference when unrestricted. Distributions of earnings are more inequitable when communication is restricted and the candidate preferred by the minority of voters is more likely to win. We also find that even restricted communication significantly increases participation and strategic voting by swing voters, above and beyond induced identity effects.