Are Internet and Paper-and-Pencil Personality Tests Truly Comparable?
研究了网络与纸笔两种形式的人格测试分数是否可比，发现尽责性等特质可比，但允许选择测试形式时某些量表出现差异，且偏好可能与受保护群体相关。
Recently, the use of technology in assessment for personnel selection has increased dramatically. An important consideration is whether test scores obtained via Internet administration are psychometrically equivalent to those obtained by the more traditional paper-and-pencil format. Our results suggest that there is comparability of scores for many personality constructs, including conscientiousness. However, invariance was not found for some scales between persons allowed to choose formats and those not given a choice of formats. As testing-format preference may be related to membership in federally protected demographic groups, this latter finding was somewhat troubling. Additionally, we illustrate the use of an experimental laboratory design to investigate possible causes of a lack of measurement invariance in Internet and paper-and-pencil comparisons.