Self-Confirming Equilibrium
自我确认均衡允许玩家对对手在均衡路径外的行为持有错误信念，这与纳什均衡不同。文章通过例子展示两者的差异，并讨论其与扩展式相关均衡及纳什均衡的关系。
Self-confirming equilibrium differs from Nash equilibrium in allowing players to have incorrect beliefs about how their opponents would play off of the equilibrium path.We provide several examples of ways that self -confirming and Nash equilibria differ.In games with "identified deviators , " all self -confirming equilibrium outcomes can be generated by extensive -form correlated equilibria.In two-player games, self -confirming equilibria with "unitary beliefs" are Nash.1.