注意间隙

Mind the Gap

Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · 2015
被引 7
ABS 3

中文导读

通过实验比较不同键间隙(1、3、5毫米)和键距(16、17毫米)对打字速度、准确率、偏好和可用性的影响,发现5毫米间隙和17毫米键距表现更优,为便携设备键盘设计提供参考。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of key gap (distance between edges of keys) on computer keyboards on typing speed, percentage error, preference, and usability. BACKGROUND: In Parts 1 and 2 of this series, a small key pitch (center-to-center distance between keys) was found to reduce productivity and usability, but the findings were confounded by gap. In this study, key gap was varied while holding key pitch constant. METHOD: Participants (N = 25) typed on six keyboards, which differed in gap between keys (1, 3, or 5 mm) and pitch (16 or 17 mm; distance between centers of keys), while typing speed, accuracy, usability, and preference were measured. RESULTS: There was no statistical interaction between gap and pitch. Accuracy was better for keyboards with a gap of 5 mm compared to a 1-mm gap (p = .04). Net typing speed (p = .02), accuracy (p = .002), and most usability measures were better for keyboards with a pitch of 17 mm compared to a 16-mm pitch. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings support keyboard designs with a gap between keys of 5 mm over 1 mm and a key pitch of 17 mm over 16 mm. APPLICATIONS: These findings may influence keyboard standards and design, especially the design of small keyboards used with portable devices, such as tablets and laptops.

人机交互工效学键盘设计用户研究