Considerations of Fairness and Strategy: Experimental Data from Sequential Games
通过三个不同博弈的实验数据，检验了博弈论作为描述性理论时是否需纳入人们对公平的感知，为理解谈判行为提供依据。
Laboratory data from bargaining experiments have started a debate about the prospects for various parts of game theory as descriptive theories of observable behavior, and about whether, to what extent, and how a successful descriptive theory must take into account peoples' perceptions of "fairness." Plausible explanations of the observed bargaining phenomena advanced by different investigators lead to markedly different predictions about what should be observed in three different games. A sharp experimental test is thus possible on this class of games, and the present paper reports the results of such a test.