盗版的真实损失是多少?来自香港微软Office的证据

What Is the True Loss Due to Piracy? Evidence from Microsoft Office in Hong Kong

Review of Economics and Statistics · 2012
被引 1
人大 AFT50ABS 4

中文导读

通过香港281名大学生的数据,估计微软Office正版与不同盗版来源的需求系统,发现消除街头盗版后多数人会转向网络盗版,政府可能高估打击盗版的收益达9倍。

Abstract

Software piracy remains rampant despite the successful measures the Hong Kong government has taken to eradicate street piracy. This is because most people prefer substituting a counterfeit copy of a software CD (street piracy) with an illegal download of the software (Internet piracy). To support this claim, I construct a unique data set from 281 college students in Hong Kong to demonstrate two things. First, I estimate a random-coefficient discrete choice demand system for Microsoft Office from legal and different illegal sources. Estimates obtained from a Bayesian approach, with a mixture of normal priors,\nindicate a strong substitution pattern between street piracy and Internet piracy. Second, I conduct counterfactuals in which street piracy is absent. Results are twofold. First, most students would switch to Internet piracy. Second, the government, by assuming that each pirated copy represents a lost sale, may over-estimate the gain from eradicating piracy by up to nine times.

软件盗版互联网盗版替代效应损失估计