非假设性基于选择的联合分析与非假设性重新编码排序联合分析的结果是否相似?

Are Results from Non‐hypothetical Choice‐based Conjoint Analyses and Non‐hypothetical Recoded‐ranking Conjoint Analyses Similar?

American Journal of Agricultural Economics · 2013
被引 32
人大 AABS 3

中文导读

比较了非假设情境下基于选择和重新编码排序两种联合分析方法在私人物品上的结果,发现小选择集时两者相似,大选择集时出现差异,提示研究者需根据选择集大小谨慎选择方法。

Abstract

Conflicting findings have been found in previous research that compared choice‐based conjoint analysis and ranking conjoint analysis in a public good setting. The present paper revisits this issue for a private good in a non‐hypothetical context using small and large choice sets. Our results suggest that in a small choice set setting, participants' preferences and willingness to pay are similar across the two conjoint analysis formats. However, in large choice sets, a divergence between the two conjoint analysis formats emerges. Hence, the two conjoint analysis formats can only be used interchangeably in small choice sets, not in large choice sets.

非假设联合分析排序联合分析选择集规模支付意愿