国进民退?中国大规模刺激计划的企业效应

The state advances, the private sector retreats? Firm effects of China’s great stimulus programme

Cambridge Journal of Economics · 2015
被引 46
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

研究2008年大规模刺激计划后,国企比民企更能维持杠杆并获得债务,但业绩更差;民企的政治关联能缓解银行歧视并改善业绩。

Abstract

It has been argued that the state sector is advancing at the cost of the private sector in China. To examine this issue, we conduct an empirical analysis in which we exploit the launch of a large stimulus programme in the autumn of 2008. We find that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are better able to maintain their leverage levels and have better access to both short- and long-term debt compared with private firms after the introduction of the stimulus programme. We also find that preferential access to debt financing does not help SOEs improve their performance. Instead, SOEs perform significantly worse than private firms after the introduction of the stimulus programme. Moreover, political connections obtained through political participation help mitigate the discrimination that private firms face from Chinese banks and help improve firm performance. These results support the conjecture that China’s state sector is advancing, with negative consequences for aggregate performance in the economy.

国有经济扩张刺激计划国有企业政治关联