关于Smets-Wouters“风险溢价”冲击的结构性解释

On the Structural Interpretation of the Smets–Wouters “Risk Premium” Shock

Journal of Money, Credit and Banking · 2015
被引 139 · 同刊同年前 9%
人大 A-ABS 4

中文导读

证明Smets和Wouters(2007)中的“风险溢价”冲击可被解释为对安全流动性资产(如短期美国国债)需求的结构性冲击,并讨论了这一解释的若干含义。

Abstract

This article shows that the “risk premium” shock in Smets and Wouters (2007) can be interpreted as a structural shock to the demand for safe and liquid assets such as short‐term U.S. Treasury securities. Several implications of this interpretation are discussed.

安全资产需求冲击流动性偏好冲击短期国债