职业健康领域的科学产出与国际合作:1992-2001年

Scientific production and international collaboration in occupational health, 1992-2001

Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health · 2004
被引 26
ABS 3

中文导读

研究了1992-2001年间职业健康领域的国际科学产出与合作模式,发现美国产出最高,斯堪的纳维亚国家人均产出领先,国际合作与产出呈反比。

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the present study were twofold, to describe international scientific production in occupational health and to examine international collaboration in this discipline. METHODS: A bibliometric study was carried out, using Science Citation Index, in order to evaluate the articles published during the period 1992-2001 in eight representative occupational health journals. Scientific production, collaborative profiles for each country, and the significant relationships established between countries are reported. RESULTS: One or more institutions in the United States had contributed to over 40% of the articles examined. The United States was followed by the United Kingdom (9.15%) and then Sweden (8.65%). When population size effects were eliminated, the Scandinavian countries proved to be the leading producers. After correction for gross domestic product, there was an increase in the ranking of apparently scientifically modest countries. The Scandinavian countries remained high. In terms of international collaboration in general, there was an inverse relationship between the production of a country and the proportion of articles co-authored with institutions in other countries. Finally, the significant relationships between countries permitted the identification of up to six large collaboration nuclei. CONCLUSIONS: The high absolute and relative Scandinavian production is suggestive of the great importance of occupational health in these countries. Access to publication by more modest countries, scientifically speaking, is observed to occur through collaboration with the high-production countries. In this sense, it would seem necessary to study the basis underlying these relationships. Finally, the characterization of the collaborative nuclei does not differ greatly from what was expected.

职业健康文献计量学国际合作科学产出