IMPLEMENTING EXTERNALLY INDUCED INNOVATIONS: A COMPARISON OF RULE-BOUND AND AUTONOMOUS APPROACHES.
研究了核电站如何实施核监管委员会在三里岛事故后引入的安全审查创新，发现安全记录较差的电站倾向于规则约束型响应，而记录较好的电站保持自主性，这分别强化了其原有绩效。
This research analyzed how nuclear power plants implemented safety review innovations introduced by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission after the Three Mile Island accident. The findings suggested that nuclear power plants with relatively poor safety records tended to respond in a rule-bound manner that perpetuated their poor safety performance and that n"c1ear power plants whose safety records were relatively strong tended to retain their autonomy. a response that reinforced their strong safety performance. Innovations are ideas, formulas, or programs that the individuals involved perceive as new (Beyer & Trice, 1978; Hill & Utterback, 1979; Rogers, 1982; Zaltman, Duncan, & Holbeck, 1973). The stages in their development have been the subject of much scholarly discussion and debate (Rothwell & Zegveld, 1985; Strebel, 1987). A common view is that implementation follows conception, proposal generation, and initiation, and that the factors that facilitate the former inhibit the latter (Duncan, 1976: 172; Wilson, 1963: