Environmental Risk and the Iron Triangle: The Case of Yucca Mountain
研究了美国尤卡山核废料储存库选址中，产业界、政府和顾问形成的“铁三角”如何忽视科学不确定性和公众反对，并探讨将公众纳入决策成为“四边形”的必要性。
Abstract: Despite significant scientific uncertainties and strong public opposition, there appears to be an “iron triangle” of industry, government, and consultants/contractors promoting the siting of the world’s first permanent geological repository for high-level nuclear waste and spent fuel, proposed for Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Arguing that representatives of this iron triangle have ignored important epistemological and ethical difficulties with the proposed facility, I conclude that the business climate surrounding this triangle appears to leave little room for consideration of ethical issues related to public safety, environmental welfare, and citizen consent to risk. If my analysis of the Yucca Mountain case is correct and typical, then some of the most pressing questions of business ethics may concern how to break the iron triangle or, at least, how to expand it into a quadrilateral that includes the public.