Insurance-based case management to reintegrate patients on sick leave: systematic review and meta-analysis
系统综述和荟萃分析发现，针对病假超过4周的患者，保险或类似环境下的个案管理能显著缩短重返工作时间，但研究质量有限，需谨慎解读。
<h3>Objectives</h3> Work disability due to accident or illness results in considerable socioeconomic burden. Case management (CM) with individually tailored return-to-work (RTW) plans promise improved reintegration into the work force. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the impact of CM on RTW. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a search of 5 electronic databases for trials an insurance or similar setting that enrolled patients on sick leave for >4 weeks and randomised them to CM or a control group. Outcomes were time-to-RTW/lasting RTW/cumulative sickness absence. Two investigators performed quality assessment and data extraction independently and in duplicate. <h3>Results</h3> From 2200 records, we identified 9 studies from 7 countries including patients with musculoskeletal complaints (n=6), injuries (n=1), unspecific pain (n=1) and mental disorders (n=1) in an insurance (n=5) or insurance-like (n=4) setting. Sick-leave varied from 1–55 months. Risk of bias was moderate to high in most studies. Pooling of 5 studies reporting “time-to-RTW” showed a HR of 1.69 (95% CI: 1.38 to 2.07; heterogeneity: I<sup>2</sup>=0%) favouring CM. Two studies reported cumulative sickness absence after 12 months: OR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2 to 5.1) and shortening of 42 days (95% CI: 6 to 79; 34%) favouring CM. One study found no difference. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The relevant benefit of CM for RTW compared to usual care was consistent across intervention and control conditions. Limited methodological quality, ambiguous definitions for “successful” RTW and lack of important details for transfer into practice (eg, precise description of intervention) require cautious interpretation. Evidence about CM on lasting RTW is promising, but remains limited.