The Allocation of Esteem and Disesteem: A Test of Goode's Theory
在单一核心活动且绩效可测的子文化中检验古德关于尊重与不尊重的理论，发现尊重预测得到支持，不尊重结果需修正理论，并探讨网络规模和绩效频率的作用。
Goode argues that esteem is a curvilinear function of performance, while disesteem stems in part from substandard performance. Disesteem is also greater the more deviant acts one commits and the more disapproved these acts are. Further, performance and deviance may pay off (in esteem and disesteem) at different rates for people of different status. Here we test Goode's predictions in a well-bounded, well-connected subculture with a single central form of activity for which performance quality is clearly measurable. His esteem predictions, which are essential to much of his larger argument, are strongly supported. The results for disesteem lead us to modify his argument. We also investigate the possible role of network size and performance frequency as mechanisms for the translation of performance and deviance into esteem or disesteem.