Philanthropy and Injustice in Mill and Addams
分析了密尔和亚当斯对慈善可能延续不公正的批评，指出慈善中的不公正源于外部领域引入或判断失误，而亚当斯则批评自愿主义原则本身。
The idea that philanthropy has promoted social justice is historically well-established. Voluntary action, however, can also be used to perpetuate injustice. In this article I analyze criticisms of philanthropy given by John Stuart Mill and Jane Addams, two individuals who appreciated the value of philanthropic effort but were clearly aware of its potential to perpetuate injustice. Mill argues that injustice in philanthropy results when introduced from other areas of life (political and legal structures or common cultural assumptions, for example) and when philanthropists use poor judgment; Addams criticizes the principle of voluntarism itself.