使用概率方法进行干预措施的成本效益分析:以荷兰建筑业石英暴露为例

401 Cost-benefit analysis of interventions using a probabilistic approach: a case focusing on quartz exposure in the Dutch construction industry

Occupational and Environmental Medicine · 2013
被引 0
ABS 3

中文导读

本文将成本效益分析发展为概率模型,纳入输入参数变异性和输出不确定性估计,应用于荷兰建筑业减少石英暴露的假设案例,计算总成本、总收益、净成本和成本效益,并识别关键变异来源。

Abstract

<h3>Objectives</h3> Ill-health due to exposure in the workplace results in high costs for employers, employees and society. Interventions can be costly and economic evaluations receive more and more attention in the decision making processes regarding investments, including for occupational health. To perform an economic evaluation information regarding the impact of interventions on exposure and subsequently, health and work performance is needed. Additionally, information regarding costs is needed. Meijster <i>et al</i>. (2011) presented an approach to evaluate the costs and benefits for different stakeholders. We further developed this approach into a probabilistic model to include variability for input parameters and obtain uncertainty estimates for output parameters. This approach is applied to a hypothetical case study focusing on reducing quartz exposure in the Dutch construction industry. <h3>Methods</h3> The original cost-benefit approach was further developed into a probabilistic approach including Monte Carlo simulations using Excel spreadsheets. This enables the user to calculate total costs, total benefits, net costs and cost-effectiveness which can be easily applied for different intervention (s). <h3>Results</h3> The implementation of the intervention resulted in a benefit of € 3,906,000 (standard deviation €3,987,000) and 7,200 saved disability-adjusted life years (standard deviation 3,000). Including uncertainty and variation for cost elements and performing Monte Carlo simulations (1000 runs) gave insight in the variability in the output. For two stakeholders (employees, society) the output was surrounded with uncertainty but cost-effective. For the third stakeholder (employers), due to the uncertainty, it was not possible to indicate whether the intervention would be cost-effective. The analysis indicated that the most important source for variance was productivity. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The described approach gives insight in costs and benefits for different stakeholders in a structured manner. Including a probabilistic approach gives valuable insight in uncertainty and sensitivity of the different cost elements resulting in a more certain outcome of the analysis.

成本效益分析职业健康概率模型蒙特卡洛模拟建筑业