A report to an academy: On carnophallogocentrism, pigs and meat-writing
批评组织研究过于人类中心，以工厂化养猪为例，借用德里达的“肉食阳具逻各斯中心主义”概念，提出“肉类书写”方法，在学术写作中共同建构人类与非人类物种。
How can organisational studies theory respond to the call of nonhuman animals? This article argues there is ‘too much humanism’ in organisational studies and defines the problem as originating in language practices. The example of factory-farmed pigs is used to illustrate the argument. Derrida’s term carnophallogocentrism is used to suggest that ethical thinking about the animal be moved from face-to-face encounters through the eyes to the mouth and that by adopting methods used in literature and ‘feminist dog-writing’ ways can be found to co-constitute human and nonhuman species in academic writing practices. The term meat-writing is offered as a practice of challenging carnophallogocentrism.