使徒的正义:从摩尔的《伦理学原理》到凯恩斯的《通论》(1903-1936)剑桥对经济不平等的反思

The Apostles’ justice: Cambridge reflections on economic inequality from Moore’sPrincipia Ethicato Keynes’sGeneral Theory(1903–36)

Cambridge Journal of Economics · 2015
被引 5
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

考察了剑桥使徒社成员及追随者对经济不平等的分析,挑战了使徒社不关心社会问题的普遍看法,并探讨了摩尔哲学对其社会意识的影响。

Abstract

This article explores economic justice in the writings of the Cambridge authors G. L. Dickinson, G. Shove, R. Hawtrey, D. H. Robertson, H.O. Meredith, J. H. Bell and F. Ramsey, who were either members of the Apostles’ discussion society or, like Hugh Dalton, ‘lay’ followers of its philosophical leader, G. E. Moore. The article challenges the prevalent view depicting the Apostles as uninterested in social problems. Their analyses of economic inequality are reviewed in connection with the Marshallian tradition, the impact of Fabianism and J. M. Keynes’s views of social justice. Special attention is paid to some neglected aspects of Moore’s <it>Principia Ethica</it>, which were debated in the Society and influenced the Apostles’ social awareness. They believed that large inequalities were both unjust and inefficient, and, as Moore’s disciples, they rejected the hedonistic perspective and considered justice not as an end in itself but as a means to the Good.

剑桥学派经济不平等社会正义使徒社