A cricket ground or a football stadium? The business of ground sharing at the Adelaide Oval before 1973
研究了1973年前板球和澳式足球共用阿德莱德椭圆体育场时，资产控制方与使用方因目标不同而围绕场地改造展开的博弈，通过反事实分析推演不同决策的后果。
Before 1973, cricket and Australian Football used the Adelaide Oval for major games during their respective seasons. Football’s popularity as a spectator sport prompted its organising body to seek to build an improved stadium, but cricket authorities controlled the asset and acted to maintain its specialised character as a cricket ground. A case study of how the gains from a shared capital good are negotiated when asset controllers and users have different objectives is provided. A series of counterfactual scenarios based on football remaining at the Oval is constructed from archival sources and their outcomes projected based on data in financial reports.