When Ethical Tones at the Top Conflict: Adapting Priority Rules to Reconcile Conflicting Tones
研究指出多组织工作环境中存在多种相互冲突的伦理基调，并基于综合社会契约理论提出一种多基调调和流程，通过优先规则解决冲突，适用于过度收费、工人安全和客户倡导等场景。
ABSTRACT: While tone at the top is widely regarded as an important predictor of ethical behavior in organizations, we argue that recent research overlooks the various conflicting ethical tones present in many multi-organizational work settings. Further, we propose that the resolution processes promulgated in many firms and professional associations to reconcile this conflict reinforce the tone at the bottom or a tone at the top of the employee’s organization, and that both of these approaches can conflict with the tone at the top of other important organizations such as professional and regulatory organizations. Here we adapt Integrative Social Contract Theory’s priority rules to propose a multi-tone reconciliation process which prioritizes conflicting ethical tones based upon features of the organization and the effects on society. Using three contextualizations (overbilling, worker safety and client advocacy), we demonstrate the effectiveness of the multi-tone reconciliation process over current processes. We conclude with recommendations for future research and implications for practice.