The Hidden Factors Behind Sponsorship and Image Transfer
本文探讨赞助中的形象转移，指出除了从活动到品牌的单向转移，还存在品牌到活动的双向转移，并分析品牌与客户、品牌与活动的关系以及埋伏营销的影响。
Editors’ NoteContinuing our series inviting leading academics and practitioners to offer commentaries on important challenges facing the advertising business, Gerard Prendergast and Marc Mazodier of the Hong Kong Baptist University School of Business—with Aishwarya Paliwal of Prosperity Investments Worldwide Ltd—provide an assessment of the theory and practice of sponsorship. Their starting point is that sponsorship (the act of providing resources for a sports event, or other activity in exchange for advertising) mainly has been predicated on the concept of “unidirectional transfer,” whereby the image of the event is transferred to the brand. What they deftly point out, however, is that there is also potential for “bidirectional transfer,” whereby the image of the brand is transferred to the event. The authors go on to examine the importance of the relationship between the brand and its customers, the relationship between the brand and the event, and the potential wrecking impact of ambush marketers on a sponsored event. The topic is particularly timely in light of the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio.Douglas WestProfessor, King’s College LondonContributing Editor, Journal of Advertising Research