Do Client Characteristics Really Drive the Big N Audit Quality Effect? New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching
研究了倾向得分匹配设计选择和审计质量指标的有效性是否影响大型审计事务所审计质量效应的结论，发现多数设计支持大型事务所效应，认为断言PSM消除该效应为时过早。
A large auditing literature concludes that Big N auditors provide higher audit quality than non-Big N auditors. Recently, however, a high-profile study suggests that propensity score matching (PSM) on client characteristics eliminates the Big N effect [Lawrence A, Minutti-Meza M, Zhang P (2011) Can Big 4 versus non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? Accounting Rev. 86(1):259–286]. We conjecture that this finding may be affected by PSM’s sensitivity to its design choices and/or by the validity of the audit quality measures used in the analysis. To investigate, we examine random combinations of PSM design choices that achieve covariate balance, and four commonly used audit quality measures. We find that the majority of these design choices support a Big N effect for most of the audit quality measures. Overall, our findings show that it is premature to suggest that PSM eliminates the Big N effect. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting.