产品线捆绑:为什么航空公司捆绑高端而酒店捆绑低端

Product Line Bundling: Why Airlines Bundle High-End While Hotels Bundle Low-End

Marketing Science · 2016
被引 58
FT 50UTD 24ABS 4★

中文导读

研究了航空公司与酒店等产品线中,为何低核心差异化的行业(如航空)倾向捆绑高端产品,而高核心差异化的行业(如酒店)倾向捆绑低端产品,并分析了捆绑如何影响产品线内竞争与差异化。

Abstract

Product lines are ubiquitous. For example, Marriott International manages high-end ultra-luxury hotels (e.g., Ritz-Carlton) and low-end economy hotels (e.g., Fairfield Inn). Firms often bundle core products with ancillary services (or add-ons). Interestingly, empirical observations reveal that industries with ostensibly similar characteristics (e.g., customer types, costs, competition, distribution channels, etc.) employ different bundling strategies. For example, airlines bundle high-end first class with ancillary services (e.g., breakfast, entertainment) while hotel chains bundle ancillary services (e.g., breakfast, entertainment) at the low-end. We observe, unlike hotel lines that are highly differentiated at different geographic locations, airlines suffer low core differentiation because all passengers (first-class and economy) are at the same location (i.e., same plane, weather, delays, cancellations, etc.). In general, we find product lines with low core differentiation (e.g., airlines, amusement parks) routinely bundle high-end while product lines with highly differentiated cores (e.g., hotels, restaurants) routinely bundle low-end. High-end bundling makes the high-end more attractive, increasing line differentiation (less intraline competition) while low-end bundling decreases line differentiation. Therefore, bundling allows optimal differentiation given a differentiation constraint (complex costs). Last, firms may use strategic bundling for targeting in their core products; e.g., low-end hotels bundle targeted add-ons unattractive to high-end consumers such as lower-quality breakfasts and slower Internet. Data, as supplemental material, are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2016.1004 .

市场营销产业组织产品差异化捆绑策略竞争策略