财政联盟再探讨

Fiscal unions redux

Economic Theory · 2017
被引 4
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

探讨在发达国际金融市场下,货币联盟是否需要主动的联盟层面机构来提供跨国保险,结论是金融市场可替代该机构,除非成员国无力或不愿采取理想政策。

Abstract

Before the advent of sophisticated international financial markets, a widely accepted belief was that within a monetary union, a union-wide authority orchestrating fiscal transfers between countries is necessary to provide adequate insurance against country-specific economic fluctuations. A natural question is then: Do sophisticated international financial markets obviate the need for such an active union-wide authority? We argue that they do. Specifically, we show that in a benchmark economy with no international financial markets, an activist union-wide authority is necessary to achieve desirable outcomes. With sophisticated international financial markets, however, such an authority is unnecessary if its only goal is to provide cross-country insurance. Since restricting the set of policy instruments available to member countries does not create a fiscal externality across them, this result holds in a wide variety of settings. Finally, we establish that an activist union-wide authority concerned just with providing insurance to member countries is optimal only when individual countries are either unable or unwilling to pursue desirable policies.

货币联盟财政转移国际金融市场保险机制