Digital and analog logics: An analysis of the discourse on property rights and information goods
本文分析了杜克法学院跨学科研讨会上关于信息商品产权与公共领域的论点，发现支持强化产权和扩大公共领域的论述分别遵循数字逻辑与模拟逻辑，并识别出五种论据类别和两种时间框架。
We examine arguments both for strengthening property rights and expanding the public domain for digital information goods. Specifically, we conduct a Toulminian analysis of arguments made at a cross-disciplinary symposium at Duke Law School on information goods and the public domain. We find that there are two "logics" underlying arguments on issues related to information goods: what we describe as digital and analog logics. We also identify five argument categories—profit motive, economic efficiency, innovation, ethics and fundamental rights, and temporality—and two different time frames used for judging impacts—proximal and distal. We conclude with a number of theory-generating propositions and a provocation for our conceptions of capitalism in the digital age.