The limits of ontological critique: from judgmental rationality to justification
用经济学中的惯例框架，系统比较剑桥社会本体论与主流经济学的意识形态配置，解释为何前者未能引发主流回应，并探讨如何更新批判策略。
The Cambridge Social Ontology (CSO) programme’s inability to generate a meaningful dialogue with mainstream economics is difficult to understand by mere reference to judgmental rationality and without reference to CSO’s ideological configuration. Our paper uses an économie des conventions framework to draw systematic comparisons between CSO’s ideological configuration and the ideological configurations of mainstream economic theories and practice. The resulting analysis helps us to understand not only why CSO generated little response from the mainstream, but also how CSO might renew its critique in ways that might be more likely to produce a response.