Does altruism matter for remittances?
通过独裁者博弈实验测量印度在卡塔尔务工人员的利他倾向，发现利他主义整体不影响汇款，但对有贷款义务的群体有显著正向作用，而传统间接检验无法发现此关系。
We provide a direct test of the impact of altruism on remittances. From a sample of Indian migrant workers in Qatar, we elicit the propensity to share with others from their responses in a dictator game and use it as a proxy for altruism. For the entire sample, we find that altruism does not seem to matter. However, we document a strong positive relationship between altruism and remittances for a subset of migrants with a loan obligation, whereas indirect tests of altruism, typically used in the literature, would fail to establish this relationship. We explain the role of loan obligations with a standard remittance model extended with reference-dependent preferences.