Election outcomes under different ways to announce preferences: an analysis of the 2015 parliament election in the Austrian federal state of Styria
利用2015年奥地利施泰尔马克州议会选举中约1000名选民的偏好数据，分析了多种投票规则下的假设性社会结果、结果稳定性及对不同类型政党的影响。
We use preference data from the 2015 parliament election in the Austrian federal state of Styria to analyze different voting rules. An exit poll right after the election collected data on ordinal and cardinal preferences from approximately 1000 actual voters. Our analysis is threefold. First, we determine the hypothetical social outcomes under different voting rules; second, we investigate the stability of the outcomes under those rules. Finally, we provide a categorization of different types of parties and analyze the impact of certain voting rules (Plurality Rule, Plurality Run Off, Hare System, Condorcet Method, Approval Voting, Borda Rule, Evaluative Voting, and Majority Judgment) on the performances of parties in those scenarios.