Supranational identities in planning
研究了文化、战略和功能三种区域认同在超国家规划中如何交织，以北美卡斯卡迪亚和欧洲巴伦支为例，发现领土与网络互动塑造了有界区域和区域认同，同时认同也出现在模糊空间中。
This paper studies how different kinds of regional identities (cultural, strategic and functional) are intertwined in supranational planning processes. By using Cascadia in North America and Barents in Europe as examples, it is shown that although the significance of identity is relatively unclear, territory–network interplay contributes to the idea of (bounded) regions and regional identities. Issues related to territorial symmetry and inclusion/exclusion indicate that while territory has its allure, identity can also emerge within softer, fuzzy spaces with several simultaneous demarcations. Although strategic and functional identities are emphasized in contemporary (soft) planning, elements of cultural identity can be observed, too.