Maintaining the National Accounts as Official Statistics
指出将国民账户框架扩展至生产率分析会损害其作为可靠官方统计的地位，建议通过卫星账户满足数据需求，并重新考虑2008年SNA中知识资本化和政府服务直接物量测度的做法。
Confidence in national accounts is undermined by expanding the conceptual framework to serve the needs of productivity analysis. Extensions of the SNA to include knowledge assets as produced output and direct volume measures of government output require an increasing number of assumptions and imputations, which threaten the status of national accounts as a reliable source of official economic statistics. Both national accounts and productivity analysis would be better served by meeting the data needs of productivity analysis through satellite systems. It is recommended that the movement towards increased recognition of capital formation of knowledge in the core system of national accounts be halted. The recording of the performance of Research and Development expenditures as capital formation and the endorsement of direct volume measures for the provision of government services introduced with the 2008 SNA should be reconsidered in the next revision of the SNA.