司法对总统极化行政国家的回应

The Judicial Response to the Presidential Polarization of the Administrative State

The American Review of Public Administration · 2018
被引 7
ABS 3

中文导读

本文梳理了20世纪末至今司法对行政国家监督的演变,指出联邦法院采用临时性方法决定监督范围,这损害了行政国家,未能为总统利用官僚权力实施政策提供充分指导。

Abstract

From the late 20th century through today, the relationship between the administrative state and the judiciary has undergone major changes. The same period has seen presidential administrations seek to make use of bureaucratic power to implement their public policy initiatives without having to obtain the approval of Congress. After reviewing the evolution of judicial oversight of the administrative state, the essay argues that the federal courts now make use of an ad hoc approach for determining the scope of judicial oversight of the administrative process. The essay argues that the use of this ad hoc approach has done serious damage to the administrative state, providing insufficient guidelines for presidential administrations to make use of bureaucratic power to implement public policy initiatives.

行政法政治学公共管理司法制度总统制