The role of psychic distance in entry mode decisions: Magnifying the threat of opportunism or increasing the need for local knowledge?
通过实验方法测量管理者对心理距离的感知，研究发现心理距离主要增加企业对本地互补资产的需求，促使他们选择合资企业，而非放大机会主义威胁。
Research Summary: With respect to entry mode decisions, psychic distance may play two contradictory roles. On one hand, the transaction cost perspective is concerned with opportunism. Psychic distance magnifies the threat of opportunism, which encourages higher levels of control by foreign firms. Conversely, the new internalization perspective emphasizes the role of complementary assets controlled by local entities. Distance increases the need to access local knowledge, which encourages firms to seek joint ventures. By adopting an experimental approach and measuring managers' a priori perceptions of distance, this article contributes to the literature by providing a more sophisticated approach for discriminating between these effects. The results indicate that distance magnifies the need for firms to access complementary assets; however, distance does not appear to magnify the threat of opportunism. Managerial Summary: This article explores the role that psychic distance (i.e., differences across countries in culture, language, religion, etc.) plays in how firms enter foreign markets. Specifically, do they prefer wholly owned subsidiaries (WOS) or do they prefer to form joint ventures (JV) with local players? One perspective argues that firms are concerned about potential partners in a foreign market taking advantage of them; thus, they will prefer the greater control a WOS offers. Conversely, firms may simply recognize that these differences put them at a disadvantage and prefer a JV as a way to gain local knowledge. Our experiments indicate that the latter explanation dominates. When entering very different countries, managers seem to prefer JVs in order to access key local knowledge.