比例代表制下的收入再分配:一个修正

Redistributing Income under Proportional Representation: A Correction

Journal of Political Economy · 2018
被引 0
人大 A+FT50ABS 4*

中文导读

指出Austen-Smith(2000)关于选举制度与再分配水平关系的理论证明存在错误,提供替代证明并确认原结论仍然成立。

Abstract

Austen-Smith (2000) reports a theoretical result that if the cost of entering the workforce is sufficiently low, winner-take-all political systems induce endogenous redistribution levels that are systematically lower than those determined by proportional representation systems (Proposition 6). The proof in Austen-Smith (2000) has a mistake. We explain the mistake and offer an alternative proof. The conclusion of the original paper continues to hold.

比例代表制赢者通吃制收入再分配内生再分配