Commentary on ‘Democracy and worker representation in the management of change: Lessons from Kurt Lewin and the Harwood Studies’
这篇评论强调研究者需明确研究中的规范性框架，关注工人组织对组织过程的影响，并重视工人对组织政策和条件发言权的期望。
This brief commentary highlights the importance of three key points in Desmond and Wilson’s (2018) critique of Coch and French’s (1948) study of resistance to change: (1) researchers need to make explicit the normative frame of reference guiding their research; (2) care is needed to consider the roles that formal or informal worker organizations have on organizational processes and outcomes; and (3) more attention needs to be paid to the expectations that workers have for a voice in organizational policies and workplace conditions.