面临不同环境监管压力的企业在创新实践互补性上表现是否不同?

Do firms with different levels of environmental regulatory pressure behave differently regarding complementarity among innovation practices?

BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT · 2020
被引 59
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

研究西班牙2008-2015年企业数据,发现环境创新、组织创新和培训在清洁与污染行业中互补模式不同,清洁行业多管齐下可提升生产率,污染行业则培训与环境创新更互补。

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the complementary effects among environmental innovation, organizational innovation, and training for innovation and their effect on firm productivity, within a supermodularity framework. Furthermore, it attempts to understand whether different innovation practices are complements or substitutes for firm profitability according to the industrial environmental regulation context by distinguishing between clean and dirty industries. Using a Spanish technological innovation panel survey over the period 2008–2015, our findings indicate that the interrelationship between different innovation practices is complementary rather than substitutive, and the pattern of complementarity among innovation practices differs according to the environmental regulation under which an industry operates. Engaging in a broad range of innovation practices such as environmental and organizational innovations, clean industry can strengthen productivity. For dirty industries, our results indicate a greater affinity between training activities and environmental innovation than between environmental innovation and organizational innovation on firm productivity achievement. Taken all together, these results provide managers with considerable insights in terms of how to adapt the various combinatorial practices to the industrial environment in which they are embedded, taking market and regulatory pressure into account.

环境监管企业创新生产率产业组织