Measuring Time Use in Developing Country Agriculture: Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
比较了发展中国家农业家庭时间利用调查的两种方法（典型问题与时间日记），发现典型问题并不总是更省时，回忆准确性受活动规律性和调查员能力影响，并建议结合其他学科方法以捕捉时间利用的数量与质量。
This paper discusses the challenges associated with implementing time-use surveys among agricultural households in developing countries and offers advice on best practices for two common measurement methods: stylized questions and time diaries. Using data from Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) surveys in Bangladesh and Uganda, it finds that stylized questions do not always produce shorter interviews compared to time diaries, and recall accuracy may depend on the regularity and saliency of the activity and enumerator abilities. The paper suggests that combining promising methodological innovations from other disciplines with mainstream time-use data collection methods would allow capture of both the quantity and quality of time and provide richer insights into gendered time-use patterns. Broadening the scope of time-use research to other aspects of well-being can help identify how time constraints contribute to gender inequality and inform the design of policies and interventions to relieve those constraints.HIGHLIGHTS Time-use surveys are essential for addressing gender disparities, yet little research has compared time-use survey methods in developing countries.Developing country agricultural contexts present unique logistical challenges to time-data collection, including low literacy and unfamiliarity with clock-oriented time.In Bangladesh and Uganda, there are systematic differences between time-use estimates obtained using stylized questions and time diaries.Men and women experience different emotions toward different types of work, and gender gaps exist in the distribution of pleasant and unpleasant activities.Learning from non-economics disciplines, including research on quality of time, leads to richer insights into gendered time-use patterns.