交易账簿与信用风险:巴塞尔审查有多根本?

Trading book and credit risk: How fundamental is the Basel review?

Journal of Banking & Finance · 2016
被引 24
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

分析了巴塞尔新框架对交易账簿信用风险的规定,包括双因子模型和99.9% VaR资本要求,通过数值应用考察了这些规定对风险度量和风险因子贡献的实际影响。

Abstract

Within the new Basel regulatory framework for market risks, non-securitization credit positions in the trading book are subject to a separate default risk charge (formally incremental default risk charge). Banks using the internal model approach are required to use a two-factor model and a 99.9% VaR capital charge. This model prescription is intended to reduce risk-weighted asset variability, a known feature of internal models, and improve their comparability among financial institutions. In this paper, we analyze the theoretical foundations and relevance of these proposals. We investigate the practical implications of the two-factor and correlation calibration constraints through numerical applications. We introduce the Hoeffding decomposition of the aggregate unconditional loss to provide a systematic-idiosyncratic representation. In particular, we examine the impacts of a J-factor correlation structure on risk measures and risk factor contributions for long-only and long-short credit-sensitive portfolios.

巴塞尔协议III交易账簿信用风险违约风险资本两因子模型