陪审员能理解概率证据吗?

Can Jurors Understand Probabilistic Evidence?

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society · 1991
被引 98 · 同刊同年前 9%
ABS 3

中文导读

本文综述了模拟陪审员研究,发现陪审员在有多源证据时倾向于低估而非高估统计证据,挑战了法院对概率证据的担忧。

Abstract

SUMMARY Some courts have been reluctant to admit testimony expressing probabilities because of a concern that jurors will overweight it relative to other evidence. However, empirical studies indicate a tendency to underweight statistical evidence when other sources of evidence are available. This paper reviews recent studies with mock jurors.

法律心理学证据法司法决策