A Note on 'Emmisions Taxation in Durable Goods Oligopoly.'
纠正了Goering和Boyce（1999）分析中的一个错误，并扩展了他们的结果，驳斥了在垄断竞争下租赁产品的耐用性对次优排放税起决定性作用的说法。
This note corrects an error in the analysis of Goering/Boyce (1999) and extends their results. In this way, it refutes the claim that the durability of rented products plays a decisive role for the second-best emission taxation under imperfect competition.